LinkedIn Follow Up Message: How to Do It Without Nagging
Sent a LinkedIn message and got no reply? Here's how long to wait, what a good LinkedIn follow up message should add, and when it's time to stop chasing.
Silence on LinkedIn usually isn't a no. It's an inbox with 40 unread threads and a person who meant to reply on Tuesday. A good LinkedIn follow up message gives that person an easy reason to pick your thread back up, without making them feel chased. The trick is knowing how long to wait, how many times to try, and what to actually say the second time so it isn't just "bumping this."
Here's how to follow up after a connection request, a first message, or a conversation that went quiet, and how to tell when it's time to stop.
How long to wait
The most common mistake is following up the next morning. A day of silence means nothing. Give it room.
- After a connection request: wait about a week before any nudge. Some people check requests once a month.
- After a first message: wait 3 to 5 business days. Weekends don't count.
- After a good conversation that stalled: wait a week, maybe two if they mentioned being slammed.
If someone told you they'd get back to you "after the launch" or "next quarter," believe them and wait for that moment. Following up before the thing they named just tells them you weren't listening.
How many times, and when to stop
One follow-up is normal. A second, later, can be fine if you have something genuinely new to add. Past that, you're not following up anymore, you're pestering.
A simple rule that keeps you honest:
- Message one: your original ask.
- Message two: one follow-up, a few days later, that adds a new reason.
- Message three (optional, weeks later): only if something real changed, like they posted about the exact problem you can help with.
If two thoughtful messages get nothing, stop. No reply is an answer. Leaving on a warm note means the door stays open if their situation changes.
What a good LinkedIn follow up message adds
Here's the whole game. A follow-up should add a reason, not just repeat the ask. "Just bumping this" gives the reader nothing new to react to, so they don't.
Good follow-ups usually add one of these:
- A new development. They shipped something, you shipped something, or the market moved.
- A useful thing you made or found since. A short write-up, a relevant example, an intro.
- A lower-friction version of the ask. A yes-or-no question instead of a meeting.
And they stay short. The follow-up should be easier to reply to than the first message, never longer.
Three LinkedIn follow up messages that work
After a connection request with no reply
They never accepted, so keep it light and give a concrete reason to connect now.
Weak:
Hi Sarah, just following up on my connection request. Would love to connect!
Better:
Hi Sarah, still hoping to connect. Saw your team just opened a Berlin office. I moved our support org onto EU hours last year and hit a couple of snags worth avoiding. Happy to swap notes whenever it's useful.
The second one references something real, offers something specific, and keeps the ask optional.
After a first message that got ignored
Assume good faith. They were busy, not offended. Add a new angle.
Weak:
Hey, did you get a chance to see my message? Following up!
Better:
Hi Marcus, I know launch weeks eat everything, so no rush. Since I wrote, your team shipped the Slack integration I'd asked about, which answers half my question. The other half: does it handle private channels yet? We're evaluating for a locked-down workspace.
The better version has a fresh hook, forgives the silence, and ends on one easy question.
After a good conversation that went quiet
This one stings the most because it was going well. Don't guilt-trip. Bring back the thread with proof you followed through.
Weak:
Hi, just circling back on our chat. Any updates?
Better:
Hi Priya, our chat about onboarding drop-off stuck with me. I ran the cohort split you suggested and that day-3 cliff is real. I wrote up what I found. Want me to send it over, or is now a bad time?
You're not asking for their time. You're offering the result of theirs.
When to stop
Stop when:
- You've sent two genuine follow-ups with no reply.
- They said no, or "not right now." That's a no with a timer, so wait for the timer.
- Your next message would only exist to relieve your own impatience.
Stopping well matters. A last line like "No worries at all, I'll leave it here. Door's open if that changes." costs you nothing and leaves you welcome later. People remember who chased them and who respected a no.
The short version
- Wait longer than feels comfortable.
- Follow up once, twice at most.
- Every follow-up adds a new reason. "Bumping this" isn't a reason.
- Keep it shorter than the first message.
- When it's clearly a no, bow out warmly.
Writing a follow-up that adds something new, in a tone that sounds like you and not a sales script, is the hard part when you're staring at an ignored thread. Warmscript drafts it right there on the LinkedIn page in your own writing voice, using what's actually on the person's profile or in your past thread, so you start from a real hook instead of "just bumping this." You read it, edit it, and press Send yourself.
Write these in your own voice
Warmscript drafts your LinkedIn messages, replies, and comments right on the page, in your voice. You read every word and press Send yourself.
Try Warmscript free